Saturday 2 January 2016

FILLED WITH DELIGHT

FILLED WITH DELIGHT
What affronts the modern mind is the idea that we need religion. Many feel they can get by without it. And even some of those who go to church do so out of custom not conviction. They go but they do not feel it is a vital part of their experience. For many others this description is way off target: they experience a thirst for God and for the healing and new life they sense God is offering.
But, as one year ends and another begins, it is the first group that draws my attention. They admire the pope and the Dalai Lama and some other religious leaders for their moral stand and their compassion But they object to the claim that, with regard to modern problems, religion has answers which are in a special category, demanding the adherence of its followers.
They bask in the light of generations of enlightened people who have provided answer after answer to scientific and technical problems. And, despite periodic failures, they have seen politicians and economists provide solutions to problems that stunted the lives of millions. They have an optimistic view of what it is to be a free person, in charge of their life and making their own decisions about career, relationships, where they live and so forth. And so they don’t need religion. They can get on better without it.
If this is the dominant culture today it is, in a way, good news. How can we not rejoice that men and women are confident of their humanity and their dignity? Is this not the goal of history – to find joy in one’s own skin and in building community with others? This goal is far from being achieved universally but it is now within our grasp in a way it has never been before.
The religious person may not gain a hearing but if they did they might say, “We have failed to announce our goal.” It is not the task of faith to rein in human optimism; to put limits and strictures on human advances using an authority alien to basic human drives. If religion is seen as an outside force, out of harmony with human freedom, then, yes, it has to be rejected.
But what if it is seen as an “inside force” rising up from within a human being, something attuned to his or her deepest aspirations and longings? What if we find within ourselves something that was not there before – something that makes us alive to the whole universe and all the interrelationships inherent therein? What if we forget about religion, or our Church, as an exterior institution and see it as a channel of new life, resonant with our own deepest feelings?  And what if we say the very advances we celebrate were in large part, stimulated by, or in reaction to, the very religion we feel we can now discard? What if we see the external voice of the Church as that of the pedagogue, useful for a time, but now no longer needed as the interior law has taken over?
This Sunday we celebrate the Epiphany. This is an extraordinarily vivid festival: a story of wise men coming from the East to search for a new-born child. They find him and go away rejoicing. Rejoicing at what? It was hardly because they saw a new baby. There were plenty of those where they came from. No, it was because of this baby. They recognised that humanity had reached the point where it could be transformed from within. Someone had come who would live a fully human life and live it with utter authenticity.  The Law of Moses, acting as an external force, tried to corral some people into a better way of living. The life of Jesus, God among us, liberates all people from within. The wise men could relate to that and they wanted to be part of it. They were “filled with delight.”  (Matt 2:10).  
3 January 2016                                   Epiphany of the Lord

Isaiah 60:1-6                                       Ephesians 3:2-6                                  Matthew 2;1-12  

No comments:

Post a Comment