TRUST THE PEOPLE
So it is
election time. Someone threw a flyer over our gate. His priorities are water,
roads and refuse collection. Nothing very revolutionary there. Basic needs. But
basic needs not yet met. After all these years. Is the candidate ‘blowing in
the wind’? Is there any prospect of these basic things being done? Are we just
ritually marking up one more election? We go through the motions but nothing
changes. The focus of the world will be briefly on us. Then they will move away
to something else.
What we
yearn for, year after year, is subsidiarity. Long ago (in 1931) it was defined
by Pius XI as a principle by which every unit in the nation – family, local
council, district, province and central government – performs the tasks which
it can do at its own level. ‘The true aim of all social activity should be to
help individual members of the social body, but never to destroy or absorb them.’
In other words, no higher body in the state should take to itself powers which
lower bodies can do.
Paul VI
commented: ‘To take politics seriously at its different levels – local,
regional, national and worldwide - is to affirm the duty of every person to
recognise the concrete reality and the value of freedom of choice that is
offered to them to seek to bring about both the good of the city and of the
nation and of all people. Politics are a demanding manner – but not the only
one – of living the Christian commitment to the service of others.’
So there we
have it. There are jobs to be done - providing water, mending roads, collecting
rubbish – and no shortage of people willing to work. But no one, at the local
level, to say nothing of the national level, is able to exercise their freedom
to organise and carry out these works. So they are not done. Our social fabric
is gridlocked, paralysed. And we are faced with five more years of inaction
while the people languish in poverty and frustration.
It would
surely be a simple matter to allow people to develop their social and economic
activity at the level where they are able to do it. But there seems to be a
terrible fear that if the people organise themselves on the local level – and
succeed – it will somehow reflect badly on those at a higher level. And yet is
it not obvious that if people succeed at the local level, it will redound
positively on those at a high level? Parents take delight in the achievements
of their children.
Do the
people in the higher levels trust the ordinary people?
15 August
2023
No comments:
Post a Comment